ABOUT US
|
VIDEO LOCKER
|
FAQ's
|
CONTACT US
ACCOUNT
SIGN IN
WAC Bowl Previews
WAC Bowl Previews
Home
The Poll
2009 Bowl Schedule
2009 Conference Bowl Previews
WAC Bowl Previews
NEW MEXICO BOWL
VS
Wyoming (6-6) Breakdown:
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Mountain West
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
86
128.00
Nevada
362.25
6
Air Force
273.58
Passing Offense
103
170.67
Houston
450.00
8
BYU
288.92
Total Offense
112
298.67
Houston
581.23
9
TCU
469.08
Scoring Offense
111
16.92
Boise St.
44.15
8
TCU
40.67
Rushing Defense
91
170.50
Texas
62.15
8
TCU
80.50
Pass Efficiency Defense
69
130.91
Alabama
88.81
6
TCU
90.28
Total Defense
83
395.58
TCU
233.25
7
TCU
233.25
Scoring Defense
75
27.25
Alabama
11.00
5
TCU
12.42
Net Punting
13
38.24
Georgia
42.84
2
Air Force
39.40
Punt Returns
12
13.88
LSU
18.64
1
Wyoming
13.88
Kickoff Returns
T-46
22.55
TCU
30.62
4
TCU
30.62
Turnover Margin
20
.58
Rutgers
1.67
2
Air Force
1.42
Pass Defense
73
225.08
Air Force
148.67
6
Air Force
148.67
Passing Efficiency
112
104.35
Cincinnati
166.19
9
TCU
162.16
Sacks
78
1.67
Pittsburgh
3.75
7
TCU
2.67
Tackles For Loss
73
5.42
Middle Tenn.
8.83
4
Utah
7.00
Sacks Allowed
107
2.92
Boise St.
.38
8
TCU
.83
Fresno State (8-4) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
7
231.58
Nevada
362.25
2
Nevada
362.25
Passing Offense
79
204.33
Houston
450.00
6
Hawaii
337.00
Total Offense
19
435.92
Houston
581.23
6
Nevada
521.58
Scoring Offense
14
34.33
Boise St.
44.15
3
Boise St.
44.15
Rushing Defense
111
212.42
Texas
62.15
7
Nevada
114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense
74
132.22
Alabama
88.81
4
Boise St.
103.53
Total Defense
97
411.67
TCU
233.25
5
Boise St.
299.62
Scoring Defense
81
27.83
Alabama
11.00
4
Boise St.
17.69
Net Punting
11
38.71
Georgia
42.84
2
Boise St.
38.82
Punt Returns
40
10.78
LSU
18.64
4
Louisiana Tech
12.33
Kickoff Returns
70
21.41
TCU
30.62
5
Boise St.
27.27
Turnover Margin
T-105
-.75
Rutgers
1.67
6
Boise St.
1.46
Pass Defense
32
199.25
Air Force
148.67
3
Boise St.
172.77
Passing Efficiency
28
141.75
Cincinnati
166.19
3
Boise St.
164.23
Sacks
120
.75
Pittsburgh
3.75
9
Nevada
2.33
Tackles For Loss
82
5.25
Middle Tenn.
8.83
3
Boise St.
7.46
Sacks Allowed
39
1.50
Boise St.
.38
3
Boise St.
.38
Preview by Coach Duncan
Kicking off the bowl season for 2009-2010 is the New Mexico Bowl coming to us from the campus of Albuquerque's own New Mexico Lobos. The 6-6 Wyoming Cowboys of the MWC take on the 8-4 Fresno State Bulldogs out of the WAC. This is the first time these two teams have played since their WAC days and the 1999 creation of the Mountain West Conference. The Bulldogs won the last meeting in 1997 by a score of 24-7 and the overall series is tied 3-3.
This game could actually look worse then the last time the teams played due to the presence of Fresno's star running back Ryan Matthews. He has the career school record for touchdowns at 36, he is second all-time in rushing yards, and he also has a school record 10 100 yard rushing games in a season this year. Obviously after putting up stats like this, the junior running back is considering a jump to the NFL. A great performance in this game could certainly catapult him closer to the top of the RB chart.
Fresno will also be looking for great performances from QB Ryan Colburn who has 2333 passing yards, 18 TD's, and 11 INT's this season. Look for kicker Kevin Goessling to have another good game as well. He has hit his last 15 straight field goals after missing his first FG try. He is 22-24 going back to last season. Coming off of a big last second victory over Big 10 Illinois look for the Bulldogs to continue pounding the ball.
Wyoming will be led by true freshman QB Austyn Carta-Samuels. He has 1752 passing yards with 7 TD's and 4 INT's this season. Another true freshman, RB Alvester Alexander, is the teams leading rusher this season with 503 yards and 6 TD's. Junior David Leonard is the teams leading receiver with 70 receptions, 645 yards, and 1 TD.
ILB Brian Hendricks will get the job of leading the defense in trying to stop Matthews. Hendricks, the teams leading tackler, looks to rebound and have a great end to the season after missing several games this year due to injuries.
Look for Fresno to have a huge advantage in this game due to the presence of Matthews. If you have not had a chance to see this young man play then don't miss it here because it could very well be the last time you see him in a Bulldogs uniform as he attempts to run all over this low-rated rushing defense. Wyoming must take advantage of its plus-7 turnover ratio if they hope to have a chance; that is certainly better then Fresno's minus-9 ratio. If the Cowboys can generate some turnovers, consistently move the ball, and keep Fresno's defense on the field, they could pull out the upset victory.
I expect to see Fresno State win this ball game by a good margin, but I hope to see Wyoming keep it close. First year coach Dave Christensen has done a great job getting Wyoming to a bowl considering the youth he has playing, but his first bowl victory will most likely not come at the expense of long time coach Pat Hill.
Final score: Fresno State 35
Wyoming 17
Sheraton Hawaii Bowl
VS
Southern Methodist (7-5) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Conference USA
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
100
112.75
Nevada
362.25
10
UAB
229.92
Passing Offense
28
267.17
Houston
450.00
3
Houston
450.00
Total Offense
61
379.92
Houston
581.23
6
Houston
581.23
Scoring Offense
54
27.92
Boise St.
44.15
5
Houston
43.92
Rushing Defense
88
169.17
Texas
62.15
7
UCF
82.50
Pass Efficiency Defense
46
122.07
Alabama
88.81
1
SMU
122.07
Total Defense
92
404.00
TCU
233.25
6
UCF
348.08
Scoring Defense
90
29.08
Alabama
11.00
7
UCF
20.67
Net Punting
71
35.01
Georgia
42.84
9
East Carolina
39.35
Punt Returns
8
14.53
LSU
18.64
1
SMU
14.53
Kickoff Returns
53
22.21
TCU
30.62
6
Southern Miss.
26.09
Turnover Margin
57
.08
Rutgers
1.67
6
East Carolina
1.00
Pass Defense
82
234.83
Air Force
148.67
3
Tulane
218.00
Passing Efficiency
55
130.20
Cincinnati
166.19
6
Houston
159.56
Sacks
78
1.67
Pittsburgh
3.75
8
UCF
3.08
Tackles For Loss
89
5.08
Middle Tenn.
8.83
9
UCF
7.58
Sacks Allowed
104
2.83
Boise St.
.38
11
East Carolina
.85
Nevada (8-4) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
1
362.25
Nevada
362.25
1
Nevada
362.25
Passing Offense
107
159.33
Houston
450.00
8
Hawaii
337.00
Total Offense
2
521.58
Houston
581.23
1
Nevada
521.58
Scoring Offense
5
40.58
Boise St.
44.15
2
Boise St.
44.15
Rushing Defense
26
114.67
Texas
62.15
1
Nevada
114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense
114
155.30
Alabama
88.81
8
Boise St.
103.53
Total Defense
88
398.92
TCU
233.25
3
Boise St.
299.62
Scoring Defense
74
27.17
Alabama
11.00
3
Boise St.
17.69
Net Punting
34
37.08
Georgia
42.84
4
Boise St.
38.82
Punt Returns
115
3.63
LSU
18.64
8
Louisiana Tech
12.33
Kickoff Returns
33
23.34
TCU
30.62
2
Boise St.
27.27
Turnover Margin
70
-.17
Rutgers
1.67
4
Boise St.
1.46
Pass Defense
119
284.25
Air Force
148.67
9
Boise St.
172.77
Passing Efficiency
32
140.75
Cincinnati
166.19
4
Boise St.
164.23
Sacks
36
2.33
Pittsburgh
3.75
1
Nevada
2.33
Tackles For Loss
22
6.92
Middle Tenn.
8.83
2
Boise St.
7.46
Sacks Allowed
4
.75
Boise St.
.38
2
Boise St.
.38
By GoldenEagles98
Key Players:
Nevada
Colin Kaepernick (QB) 1875 yds passing (19 TD, 5 Int) 1160 yds rushing (16 TD)
Luke Lippincott (RB) 1034 yds rushing (7.7 ypc), 9 TD, 2 rec. TD
Vai Taua (RB) 1345 yds rushing (7.8 ypc), 10 TD, 2 rec. TD
Southern Methodist
Shawnbrey McNeal (RB) 1125 yds rushing (5.0 ypc), 9 TD
Emmanuel Sanders (WR) 91 rec. 1215 yds, 6 TD. 15.4 yds per punt return (1 TD)
Chase Kennemer (LB) 126 tackles (11 tfl), 1 sack, 2 Int, 4 fumble rec.
The Hawaii Bowl pits one of the most potent offensive attacks in the country in the Nevada Wolfpack against an up and coming SMU squad, led by offensive guru June Jones. The Wolfpack boast the country's leading rushing offense, gaining over 360 yards per contest on the ground. The attack is led by QB Colin Kaepernick, who is one of the nations leaders in total offense and total touchdowns. Going up against the one of the weaker run defenses in the country, Kaepernick, Vai Taua, and Luke Lippincott should find plenty of running room. If the Mustangs have any success slowing down the Wolfpack rushing attack, tight end Virgil Green and wideout Brandon Wimberly are talented enough to stretch the defense and get into the end zone.
For the SMU Mustangs, big play wideout/punt returner Emmanuel Sanders is one of the most dangerous threats in the country, catching almost 8 passes per contest and scoring 10 touchdowns. However, if the Mustangs look to pull off the upset, Shawnbrey McNeal and the SMU offensive line must control the line of scrimmage and eat up clock against the Wolfpack defense, which only gives up 114 yards per game on the ground. If the Mustangs can hold the football for long stretches then they have a chance to be successful by keeping the rushing attack of the Wolfpack on the sidelines.
SMU has been in many close games this year, and that experience could help if this game goes down to the wire. Don't look for that to be the case though. While the Mustangs should be able to find some success moving the ball, Nevada's offense is too talented and too powerful for the SMU defense to slow them down. While SMU's turnaround is one of the great stories of the college football season, the task at hand is simply too daunting despite the homecoming for June Jones back to the islands.
Nevada 47, SMU 28
Roady's Humanitarian Bowl
VS
Bowling Green (7-5) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Mid-American
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
114
81.25
Nevada
362.25
12
Northern Ill.
202.42
Passing Offense
8
310.17
Houston
450.00
1
Bowling Green
310.17
Total Offense
52
391.42
Houston
581.23
4
Toledo
438.25
Scoring Offense
62
27.33
Boise St.
44.15
5
Central Mich.
33.15
Rushing Defense
103
192.75
Texas
62.15
12
Temple
108.83
Pass Efficiency Defense
50
122.64
Alabama
88.81
5
Ohio
107.90
Total Defense
82
393.75
TCU
233.25
10
Northern Ill.
324.00
Scoring Defense
65
26.17
Alabama
11.00
7
Central Mich.
17.23
Net Punting
94
33.82
Georgia
42.84
4
Ball St.
35.93
Punt Returns
58
8.88
LSU
18.64
6
Central Mich.
13.50
Kickoff Returns
104
19.47
TCU
30.62
11
Temple
23.90
Turnover Margin
T-31
.42
Rutgers
1.67
3
Ohio
1.08
Pass Defense
34
201.00
Air Force
148.67
4
Eastern Mich.
150.50
Passing Efficiency
50
132.01
Cincinnati
166.19
4
Central Mich.
150.47
Sacks
89
1.58
Pittsburgh
3.75
8
Temple
2.75
Tackles For Loss
113
4.17
Middle Tenn.
8.83
13
Kent St.
8.42
Sacks Allowed
82
2.33
Boise St.
.38
11
Central Mich.
1.15
Idaho (7-5) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
49
160.75
Nevada
362.25
6
Nevada
362.25
Passing Offense
11
290.58
Houston
450.00
2
Hawaii
337.00
Total Offense
10
451.33
Houston
581.23
3
Nevada
521.58
Scoring Offense
25
31.83
Boise St.
44.15
4
Boise St.
44.15
Rushing Defense
77
155.58
Texas
62.15
3
Nevada
114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense
117
156.71
Alabama
88.81
9
Boise St.
103.53
Total Defense
105
424.50
TCU
233.25
7
Boise St.
299.62
Scoring Defense
112
35.50
Alabama
11.00
9
Boise St.
17.69
Net Punting
90
33.97
Georgia
42.84
8
Boise St.
38.82
Punt Returns
38
10.93
LSU
18.64
3
Louisiana Tech
12.33
Kickoff Returns
97
19.89
TCU
30.62
8
Boise St.
27.27
Turnover Margin
T-105
-.75
Rutgers
1.67
6
Boise St.
1.46
Pass Defense
114
268.92
Air Force
148.67
8
Boise St.
172.77
Passing Efficiency
10
154.06
Cincinnati
166.19
2
Boise St.
164.23
Sacks
112
1.17
Pittsburgh
3.75
8
Nevada
2.33
Tackles For Loss
117
3.92
Middle Tenn.
8.83
9
Boise St.
7.46
Sacks Allowed
62
2.00
Boise St.
.38
5
Boise St.
.38
Tostito's Fiesta Bowl
VS
TCU (12-0) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Mountain West
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
5
256.50
Nevada
362.25
2
Air Force
273.58
Passing Offense
67
212.58
Houston
450.00
6
BYU
288.92
Total Offense
4
469.08
Houston
581.23
1
TCU
469.08
Scoring Offense
4
40.67
Boise St.
44.15
1
TCU
40.67
Rushing Defense
3
80.50
Texas
62.15
1
TCU
80.50
Pass Efficiency Defense
2
90.28
Alabama
88.81
1
TCU
90.28
Total Defense
1
233.25
TCU
233.25
1
TCU
233.25
Scoring Defense
6
12.42
Alabama
11.00
1
TCU
12.42
Net Punting
101
33.46
Georgia
42.84
8
Air Force
39.40
Punt Returns
20
12.93
LSU
18.64
3
Wyoming
13.88
Kickoff Returns
1
30.62
TCU
30.62
1
TCU
30.62
Turnover Margin
41
.33
Rutgers
1.67
3
Air Force
1.42
Pass Defense
4
152.75
Air Force
148.67
2
Air Force
148.67
Passing Efficiency
3
162.16
Cincinnati
166.19
1
TCU
162.16
Sacks
21
2.67
Pittsburgh
3.75
1
TCU
2.67
Tackles For Loss
55
5.75
Middle Tenn.
8.83
3
Utah
7.00
Sacks Allowed
T-5
.83
Boise St.
.38
1
TCU
.83
Boise State (12-0) Breakdown
Category
National
Rank
Actual
National
Leader
Actual
Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense
20
194.46
Nevada
362.25
3
Nevada
362.25
Passing Offense
30
266.00
Houston
450.00
3
Hawaii
337.00
Total Offense
8
460.46
Houston
581.23
2
Nevada
521.58
Scoring Offense
1
44.15
Boise St.
44.15
1
Boise St.
44.15
Rushing Defense
40
126.85
Texas
62.15
2
Nevada
114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense
12
103.53
Alabama
88.81
1
Boise St.
103.53
Total Defense
13
299.62
TCU
233.25
1
Boise St.
299.62
Scoring Defense
16
17.69
Alabama
11.00
1
Boise St.
17.69
Net Punting
10
38.82
Georgia
42.84
1
Boise St.
38.82
Punt Returns
37
10.97
LSU
18.64
2
Louisiana Tech
12.33
Kickoff Returns
5
27.27
TCU
30.62
1
Boise St.
27.27
Turnover Margin
2
1.46
Rutgers
1.67
1
Boise St.
1.46
Pass Defense
13
172.77
Air Force
148.67
1
Boise St.
172.77
Passing Efficiency
2
164.23
Cincinnati
166.19
1
Boise St.
164.23
Sacks
72
1.77
Pittsburgh
3.75
3
Nevada
2.33
Tackles For Loss
13
7.46
Middle Tenn.
8.83
1
Boise St.
7.46
Sacks Allowed
1
.38
Boise St.
.38
1
Boise St.
.38
Preview by CoachDuncan
The 2010 Fiesta Bowl will forever be known as the BCS Buster Bowl as it is the first BCS bowl game ever to feature two non-BCS schools in the Boise State Broncos and the TCU Horned Frogs. This may be a rematch of last year's Poinsettia Bowl game won by TCU 17-16, but these are not the same two teams. Both teams have drastically improved on both sides of the ball and are undefeated to this point so expect a fantastic ball game for the chance to finish #2 in the rankings.
The game will see two of the nations best as Boise State is ranked #8 in total offense and #13 in total defense while TCU is ranked #4 in total offense and #1 in total defense. The Horned Frogs have given the Broncos their only loss in the last two seasons and the Broncos are itching to show that last year's game is not a representation of who they really are.
TCU is led by QB Andy Dalton who has 2484 passing yards, 22 TD's, 5 INT''s along with 432 rushing yards and 8 TD's. He is the key to the offense and this junior QB has done nothing but get stronger as they season has gone on. He leads RB's Joseph Turner (732 yards, 11 TD's) and Matthew Turner (667 yards, 8 TD's) out of the backfield and with his ability to run or throw the ball, it is difficult to know exactly where the ball is at any given moment.
WR Jeremy Kerley is the electrifying kick returner that you may have seen in some highlight videos this season. He is the best return man in the MWC and averages 121.8 all-purpose yards per game and has scored a TD as a wide receiver, running back, and punt returner. This guy is all over the field so look for him to make an impact in this game at some point.
The defense is led by consensus first team All-American DE Jerry Hughes. He had 11.5 sacks this season for 7th in the NCAA after leading the NCAA with 15 last season. He is the MWC defensive player of the year, the Lott Trophy winner, and the Ted Hendricks Award winner. This young man should make an easy transition to the NFL level and have a very nice game here to end his college career. LB Daryl Washington is the teams leading tackler with 99 tackles as well as 3 INT's. This team relies a lot on its defense, but with the potent offense it has found this season, they are a formidable opponent.
The Boise State Broncos are led by first team All-American QB Kellen Moore. Only a sophomore this young man has a name you had better learn and remember because you will be hearing a lot about this young man in the years to come. Already being considered one of the Heisman hopefuls next season, he has 3325 passing yards, 39 TD's, and 3 INT's. He is the national leader in passing efficiency and is one of the best QB's in all of college football.
RB Jeremy Avery is the first place you want to look if Moore doesn't have the ball. This junior has 1131 yards on 197 carries this season to go along with 6 TD's. He also has 1 receiving TD, so he is a solid dual threat back. Look for TB Doug Martin to play a large roll in this game. In the last three games after returning from injury he has rushed for 37 carries, 332 yards, and 8 TD's. Obviously this team is stronger when they can spread the ball around with both of these back healthy.
WR's Titus Young and Austin Pettis are integral to Moore's success as they have both had great seasons. Young has 71 catches for 969 yards and 10 TD's. Pettis meanwhile has 62 catches for 850 yards and 14 TD's. However, Pettis was hurt in the Nevada game and his return for the Fiesta Bowl is questionable. This could be a critical injury as they need him in order to have solid play over the middle while taking pressure off Young.
The defense is led by another strong DE in Ryan Winterswyk. He has 8.5 sacks this season and 16.5 tackles for loss. The Frogs need to keep him out of the backfield and away from the ball carriers so they can have a chance at consistent positive yardage.
The only thing more scary than how good these two teams are this season is the fact that both teams return most of their respective lineups for next season. This is a rematch we could see again next year potentially for the whole ball of wax in the national championship. It may seem like a long shot, but stranger things have happened in college football.
We should expect a fantastic game between these two teams, but it is hard to say if it is going to be a low scoring defensive game or a shootout given the two teams rankings on both sides of the ball. I would aim for somewhere in the middle as both teams work hard to keep the other contained. TCU is the stronger team overall and I see them pulling away in the end for the much closer then it looks 14 point win.
TCU 35
Boise State 21
Home
|
About Us
|
Conference Chaos
|
The Best Damn Forum
|
Best Damn Soap Box
|
The Not So Top 10
|
The Poll
|
Media Locker
|
Scores and News
|
Our Sponsors
|
Privacy Policy
|
Terms of Use
| Site Map
(C) 2010 By The Fans, LLC. All Rights Reserved