The Polls


Western Athletic Conference logo








NEW MEXICO BOWL


VS

Wyoming (6-6) Breakdown:
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Mountain West
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 86 128.00 Nevada 362.25 6 Air Force 273.58
Passing Offense 103 170.67 Houston 450.00 8 BYU 288.92
Total Offense 112 298.67 Houston 581.23 9 TCU 469.08
Scoring Offense 111 16.92 Boise St. 44.15 8 TCU 40.67
Rushing Defense 91 170.50 Texas 62.15 8 TCU 80.50
Pass Efficiency Defense 69 130.91 Alabama 88.81 6 TCU 90.28
Total Defense 83 395.58 TCU 233.25 7 TCU 233.25
Scoring Defense 75 27.25 Alabama 11.00 5 TCU 12.42
Net Punting 13 38.24 Georgia 42.84 2 Air Force 39.40
Punt Returns 12 13.88 LSU 18.64 1 Wyoming 13.88
Kickoff Returns T-46 22.55 TCU 30.62 4 TCU 30.62
Turnover Margin 20 .58 Rutgers 1.67 2 Air Force 1.42
Pass Defense 73 225.08 Air Force 148.67 6 Air Force 148.67
Passing Efficiency 112 104.35 Cincinnati 166.19 9 TCU 162.16
Sacks 78 1.67 Pittsburgh 3.75 7 TCU 2.67
Tackles For Loss 73 5.42 Middle Tenn. 8.83 4 Utah 7.00
Sacks Allowed 107 2.92 Boise St. .38 8 TCU .83

Fresno State (8-4) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 7 231.58 Nevada 362.25 2 Nevada 362.25
Passing Offense 79 204.33 Houston 450.00 6 Hawaii 337.00
Total Offense 19 435.92 Houston 581.23 6 Nevada 521.58
Scoring Offense 14 34.33 Boise St. 44.15 3 Boise St. 44.15
Rushing Defense 111 212.42 Texas 62.15 7 Nevada 114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense 74 132.22 Alabama 88.81 4 Boise St. 103.53
Total Defense 97 411.67 TCU 233.25 5 Boise St. 299.62
Scoring Defense 81 27.83 Alabama 11.00 4 Boise St. 17.69
Net Punting 11 38.71 Georgia 42.84 2 Boise St. 38.82
Punt Returns 40 10.78 LSU 18.64 4 Louisiana Tech 12.33
Kickoff Returns 70 21.41 TCU 30.62 5 Boise St. 27.27
Turnover Margin T-105 -.75 Rutgers 1.67 6 Boise St. 1.46
Pass Defense 32 199.25 Air Force 148.67 3 Boise St. 172.77
Passing Efficiency 28 141.75 Cincinnati 166.19 3 Boise St. 164.23
Sacks 120 .75 Pittsburgh 3.75 9 Nevada 2.33
Tackles For Loss 82 5.25 Middle Tenn. 8.83 3 Boise St. 7.46
Sacks Allowed 39 1.50 Boise St. .38 3 Boise St. .38

Preview by Coach Duncan

Kicking off the bowl season for 2009-2010 is the New Mexico Bowl coming to us from the campus of Albuquerque's own New Mexico Lobos. The 6-6 Wyoming Cowboys of the MWC take on the 8-4 Fresno State Bulldogs out of the WAC. This is the first time these two teams have played since their WAC days and the 1999 creation of the Mountain West Conference. The Bulldogs won the last meeting in 1997 by a score of 24-7 and the overall series is tied 3-3.
 
This game could actually look worse then the last time the teams played due to the presence of Fresno's star running back Ryan Matthews. He has the career school record for touchdowns at 36, he is second all-time in rushing yards, and he also has a school record 10 100 yard rushing games in a season this year. Obviously after putting up stats like this, the junior running back is considering a jump to the NFL. A great performance in this game could certainly catapult him closer to the top of the RB chart.
 
Fresno will also be looking for great performances from QB Ryan Colburn who has 2333 passing yards, 18 TD's, and 11 INT's this season. Look for kicker Kevin Goessling to have another good game as well. He has hit his last 15 straight field goals after missing his first FG try. He is 22-24 going back to last season. Coming off of a big last second victory over Big 10 Illinois look for the Bulldogs to continue pounding the ball.
 
Wyoming will be led by true freshman QB Austyn Carta-Samuels. He has 1752 passing yards with 7 TD's and 4 INT's this season. Another true freshman, RB Alvester Alexander, is the teams leading rusher this season with 503 yards and 6 TD's. Junior David Leonard is the teams leading receiver with 70 receptions, 645 yards, and 1 TD.
 
ILB Brian Hendricks will get the job of leading the defense in trying to stop Matthews. Hendricks, the teams leading tackler, looks to rebound and have a great end to the season after missing several games this year due to injuries.  
 
Look for Fresno to have a huge advantage in this game due to the presence of Matthews. If you have not had a chance to see this young man play then don't miss it here because it could very well be the last time you see him in a Bulldogs uniform as he attempts to run all over this low-rated rushing defense. Wyoming must take advantage of its plus-7 turnover ratio if they hope to have a chance; that is certainly better then Fresno's minus-9 ratio. If the Cowboys can generate some turnovers, consistently move the ball, and keep Fresno's defense on the field, they could pull out the upset victory.
 
I expect to see Fresno State win this ball game by a good margin, but I hope to see Wyoming keep it close. First year coach Dave Christensen has done a great job getting Wyoming to a bowl considering the youth he has playing, but his first bowl victory will most likely not come at the expense of long time coach Pat Hill.
 
Final score: Fresno State 35
                     Wyoming       17


Sheraton Hawaii Bowl
VS

Southern Methodist (7-5) Breakdown

Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Conference USA
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 100 112.75 Nevada 362.25 10 UAB 229.92
Passing Offense 28 267.17 Houston 450.00 3 Houston 450.00
Total Offense 61 379.92 Houston 581.23 6 Houston 581.23
Scoring Offense 54 27.92 Boise St. 44.15 5 Houston 43.92
Rushing Defense 88 169.17 Texas 62.15 7 UCF 82.50
Pass Efficiency Defense 46 122.07 Alabama 88.81 1 SMU 122.07
Total Defense 92 404.00 TCU 233.25 6 UCF 348.08
Scoring Defense 90 29.08 Alabama 11.00 7 UCF 20.67
Net Punting 71 35.01 Georgia 42.84 9 East Carolina 39.35
Punt Returns 8 14.53 LSU 18.64 1 SMU 14.53
Kickoff Returns 53 22.21 TCU 30.62 6 Southern Miss. 26.09
Turnover Margin 57 .08 Rutgers 1.67 6 East Carolina 1.00
Pass Defense 82 234.83 Air Force 148.67 3 Tulane 218.00
Passing Efficiency 55 130.20 Cincinnati 166.19 6 Houston 159.56
Sacks 78 1.67 Pittsburgh 3.75 8 UCF 3.08
Tackles For Loss 89 5.08 Middle Tenn. 8.83 9 UCF 7.58
Sacks Allowed 104 2.83 Boise St. .38 11 East Carolina .85

Nevada (8-4) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 1 362.25 Nevada 362.25 1 Nevada 362.25
Passing Offense 107 159.33 Houston 450.00 8 Hawaii 337.00
Total Offense 2 521.58 Houston 581.23 1 Nevada 521.58
Scoring Offense 5 40.58 Boise St. 44.15 2 Boise St. 44.15
Rushing Defense 26 114.67 Texas 62.15 1 Nevada 114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense 114 155.30 Alabama 88.81 8 Boise St. 103.53
Total Defense 88 398.92 TCU 233.25 3 Boise St. 299.62
Scoring Defense 74 27.17 Alabama 11.00 3 Boise St. 17.69
Net Punting 34 37.08 Georgia 42.84 4 Boise St. 38.82
Punt Returns 115 3.63 LSU 18.64 8 Louisiana Tech 12.33
Kickoff Returns 33 23.34 TCU 30.62 2 Boise St. 27.27
Turnover Margin 70 -.17 Rutgers 1.67 4 Boise St. 1.46
Pass Defense 119 284.25 Air Force 148.67 9 Boise St. 172.77
Passing Efficiency 32 140.75 Cincinnati 166.19 4 Boise St. 164.23
Sacks 36 2.33 Pittsburgh 3.75 1 Nevada 2.33
Tackles For Loss 22 6.92 Middle Tenn. 8.83 2 Boise St. 7.46
Sacks Allowed 4 .75 Boise St. .38 2 Boise St. .38
By GoldenEagles98

Key Players:
Nevada
Colin Kaepernick (QB)    1875 yds passing (19 TD, 5 Int) 1160 yds rushing (16 TD)
Luke Lippincott (RB)       1034 yds rushing (7.7 ypc), 9 TD, 2 rec. TD
Vai Taua (RB)                1345 yds rushing (7.8 ypc), 10 TD, 2 rec. TD
Southern Methodist
Shawnbrey McNeal (RB)  1125 yds rushing (5.0 ypc), 9 TD
Emmanuel Sanders (WR) 91 rec. 1215 yds, 6 TD. 15.4 yds per punt return (1 TD)
Chase Kennemer (LB)      126 tackles (11 tfl), 1 sack, 2 Int, 4 fumble rec.
 
    The Hawaii Bowl pits one of the most potent offensive attacks in the country in the Nevada Wolfpack against an up and coming SMU squad, led by offensive guru June Jones.  The Wolfpack boast the country's leading rushing offense, gaining over 360 yards per contest on the ground.  The attack is led by QB Colin Kaepernick, who is one of the nations leaders in total offense and total touchdowns.  Going up against the one of the weaker run defenses in the country, Kaepernick, Vai Taua, and Luke Lippincott should find plenty of running room.  If the Mustangs have any success slowing down the Wolfpack rushing attack, tight end Virgil Green and wideout Brandon Wimberly are talented enough to stretch the defense and get into the end zone.
    For the SMU Mustangs, big play wideout/punt returner Emmanuel Sanders is one of the most dangerous threats in the country, catching almost 8 passes per contest and scoring 10 touchdowns.  However, if the Mustangs look to pull off the upset, Shawnbrey McNeal and the SMU offensive line must control the line of scrimmage and eat up clock against the Wolfpack defense, which only gives up 114 yards per game on the ground.  If the Mustangs can hold the football for long stretches then they have a chance to be successful by keeping the rushing attack of the Wolfpack on the sidelines. 
    SMU has been in many close games this year, and that experience could help if this game goes down to the wire.  Don't look for that to be the case though.  While the Mustangs should be able to find some success moving the ball, Nevada's offense is too talented and too powerful for the SMU defense to slow them down.  While SMU's turnaround is one of the great stories of the college football season, the task at hand is simply too daunting despite the homecoming for June Jones back to the islands. 
Nevada 47, SMU 28


Roady's Humanitarian Bowl
VS

Bowling Green (7-5) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Mid-American
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 114 81.25 Nevada 362.25 12 Northern Ill. 202.42
Passing Offense 8 310.17 Houston 450.00 1 Bowling Green 310.17
Total Offense 52 391.42 Houston 581.23 4 Toledo 438.25
Scoring Offense 62 27.33 Boise St. 44.15 5 Central Mich. 33.15
Rushing Defense 103 192.75 Texas 62.15 12 Temple 108.83
Pass Efficiency Defense 50 122.64 Alabama 88.81 5 Ohio 107.90
Total Defense 82 393.75 TCU 233.25 10 Northern Ill. 324.00
Scoring Defense 65 26.17 Alabama 11.00 7 Central Mich. 17.23
Net Punting 94 33.82 Georgia 42.84 4 Ball St. 35.93
Punt Returns 58 8.88 LSU 18.64 6 Central Mich. 13.50
Kickoff Returns 104 19.47 TCU 30.62 11 Temple 23.90
Turnover Margin T-31 .42 Rutgers 1.67 3 Ohio 1.08
Pass Defense 34 201.00 Air Force 148.67 4 Eastern Mich. 150.50
Passing Efficiency 50 132.01 Cincinnati 166.19 4 Central Mich. 150.47
Sacks 89 1.58 Pittsburgh 3.75 8 Temple 2.75
Tackles For Loss 113 4.17 Middle Tenn. 8.83 13 Kent St. 8.42
Sacks Allowed 82 2.33 Boise St. .38 11 Central Mich. 1.15

Idaho (7-5) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 49 160.75 Nevada 362.25 6 Nevada 362.25
Passing Offense 11 290.58 Houston 450.00 2 Hawaii 337.00
Total Offense 10 451.33 Houston 581.23 3 Nevada 521.58
Scoring Offense 25 31.83 Boise St. 44.15 4 Boise St. 44.15
Rushing Defense 77 155.58 Texas 62.15 3 Nevada 114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense 117 156.71 Alabama 88.81 9 Boise St. 103.53
Total Defense 105 424.50 TCU 233.25 7 Boise St. 299.62
Scoring Defense 112 35.50 Alabama 11.00 9 Boise St. 17.69
Net Punting 90 33.97 Georgia 42.84 8 Boise St. 38.82
Punt Returns 38 10.93 LSU 18.64 3 Louisiana Tech 12.33
Kickoff Returns 97 19.89 TCU 30.62 8 Boise St. 27.27
Turnover Margin T-105 -.75 Rutgers 1.67 6 Boise St. 1.46
Pass Defense 114 268.92 Air Force 148.67 8 Boise St. 172.77
Passing Efficiency 10 154.06 Cincinnati 166.19 2 Boise St. 164.23
Sacks 112 1.17 Pittsburgh 3.75 8 Nevada 2.33
Tackles For Loss 117 3.92 Middle Tenn. 8.83 9 Boise St. 7.46
Sacks Allowed 62 2.00 Boise St. .38 5 Boise St. .38

Tostito's Fiesta Bowl
VS

TCU (12-0) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Mountain West
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 5 256.50 Nevada 362.25 2 Air Force 273.58
Passing Offense 67 212.58 Houston 450.00 6 BYU 288.92
Total Offense 4 469.08 Houston 581.23 1 TCU 469.08
Scoring Offense 4 40.67 Boise St. 44.15 1 TCU 40.67
Rushing Defense 3 80.50 Texas 62.15 1 TCU 80.50
Pass Efficiency Defense 2 90.28 Alabama 88.81 1 TCU 90.28
Total Defense 1 233.25 TCU 233.25 1 TCU 233.25
Scoring Defense 6 12.42 Alabama 11.00 1 TCU 12.42
Net Punting 101 33.46 Georgia 42.84 8 Air Force 39.40
Punt Returns 20 12.93 LSU 18.64 3 Wyoming 13.88
Kickoff Returns 1 30.62 TCU 30.62 1 TCU 30.62
Turnover Margin 41 .33 Rutgers 1.67 3 Air Force 1.42
Pass Defense 4 152.75 Air Force 148.67 2 Air Force 148.67
Passing Efficiency 3 162.16 Cincinnati 166.19 1 TCU 162.16
Sacks 21 2.67 Pittsburgh 3.75 1 TCU 2.67
Tackles For Loss 55 5.75 Middle Tenn. 8.83 3 Utah 7.00
Sacks Allowed T-5 .83 Boise St. .38 1 TCU .83

Boise State (12-0) Breakdown
Category National
Rank
Actual National
Leader
Actual Conf
Rank
Western Athletic
Conference Leader
Actual
Rushing Offense 20 194.46 Nevada 362.25 3 Nevada 362.25
Passing Offense 30 266.00 Houston 450.00 3 Hawaii 337.00
Total Offense 8 460.46 Houston 581.23 2 Nevada 521.58
Scoring Offense 1 44.15 Boise St. 44.15 1 Boise St. 44.15
Rushing Defense 40 126.85 Texas 62.15 2 Nevada 114.67
Pass Efficiency Defense 12 103.53 Alabama 88.81 1 Boise St. 103.53
Total Defense 13 299.62 TCU 233.25 1 Boise St. 299.62
Scoring Defense 16 17.69 Alabama 11.00 1 Boise St. 17.69
Net Punting 10 38.82 Georgia 42.84 1 Boise St. 38.82
Punt Returns 37 10.97 LSU 18.64 2 Louisiana Tech 12.33
Kickoff Returns 5 27.27 TCU 30.62 1 Boise St. 27.27
Turnover Margin 2 1.46 Rutgers 1.67 1 Boise St. 1.46
Pass Defense 13 172.77 Air Force 148.67 1 Boise St. 172.77
Passing Efficiency 2 164.23 Cincinnati 166.19 1 Boise St. 164.23
Sacks 72 1.77 Pittsburgh 3.75 3 Nevada 2.33
Tackles For Loss 13 7.46 Middle Tenn. 8.83 1 Boise St. 7.46
Sacks Allowed 1 .38 Boise St. .38 1 Boise St. .38


Preview by CoachDuncan

The 2010 Fiesta Bowl will forever be known as the BCS Buster Bowl as it is the first BCS bowl game ever to feature two non-BCS schools in the Boise State Broncos and the TCU Horned Frogs. This may be a rematch of last year's Poinsettia Bowl game won by TCU 17-16, but these are not the same two teams. Both teams have drastically improved on both sides of the ball and are undefeated to this point so expect a fantastic ball game for the chance to finish #2 in the rankings.
 
The game will see two of the nations best as Boise State is ranked #8 in total offense and #13 in total defense while TCU is ranked #4 in total offense and #1 in total defense. The Horned Frogs have given the Broncos their only loss in the last two seasons and the Broncos are itching to show that last year's game is not a representation of who they really are.
 
TCU is led by QB Andy Dalton who has 2484 passing yards, 22 TD's, 5 INT''s along with 432 rushing yards and 8 TD's. He is the key to the offense and this junior QB has done nothing but get stronger as they season has gone on. He leads RB's Joseph Turner (732 yards, 11 TD's) and Matthew Turner (667 yards, 8 TD's) out of the backfield and with his ability to run or throw the ball, it is difficult to know exactly where the ball is at any given moment.
 
WR Jeremy Kerley is the electrifying kick returner that you may have seen in some highlight videos this season. He is the best return man in the MWC and averages 121.8 all-purpose yards per game and has scored a TD as a wide receiver, running back, and punt returner. This guy is all over the field so look for him to make an impact in this game at some point.
 
The defense is led by consensus first team All-American DE Jerry Hughes. He had 11.5 sacks this season for 7th in the NCAA after leading the NCAA with 15 last season. He is the MWC defensive player of the year, the Lott Trophy winner, and the Ted Hendricks Award winner. This young man should make an easy transition to the NFL level and have a very nice game here to end his college career. LB Daryl Washington is the teams leading tackler with 99 tackles as well as 3 INT's. This team relies a lot on its defense, but with the potent offense it has found this season, they are a formidable opponent.
 
The Boise State Broncos are led by first team All-American QB Kellen Moore. Only a sophomore this young man has a name you had better learn and remember because you will be hearing a lot about this young man in the years to come. Already being considered one of the Heisman hopefuls next season, he has 3325 passing yards, 39 TD's, and 3 INT's. He is the national leader in passing efficiency and is one of the best QB's in all of college football.
 
RB Jeremy Avery is the first place you want to look if Moore doesn't have the ball. This junior has 1131 yards on 197 carries this season to go along with 6 TD's. He also has 1 receiving TD, so he is a solid dual threat back. Look for TB Doug Martin to play a large roll in this game. In the last three games after returning from injury he has rushed for 37 carries, 332 yards, and 8 TD's. Obviously this team is stronger when they can spread the ball around with both of these back healthy.
 
WR's Titus Young and Austin Pettis are integral to Moore's success as they have both had great seasons. Young has 71 catches for 969 yards and 10 TD's. Pettis meanwhile has 62 catches for 850 yards and 14 TD's. However, Pettis was hurt in the Nevada game and his return for the Fiesta Bowl is questionable. This could be a critical injury as they need him in order to have solid play over the middle while taking pressure off Young.
 
The defense is led by another strong DE in Ryan Winterswyk. He has 8.5 sacks this season and 16.5 tackles for loss. The Frogs need to keep him out of the backfield and away from the ball carriers so they can have a chance at consistent positive yardage.
 
The only thing more scary than how good these two teams are this season is the fact that both teams return most of their respective lineups for next season. This is a rematch we could see again next year potentially for the whole ball of wax in the national championship. It may seem like a long shot, but stranger things have happened in college football.
 
We should expect a fantastic game between these two teams, but it is hard to say if it is going to be a low scoring defensive game or a shootout given the two teams rankings on both sides of the ball. I would aim for somewhere in the middle as both teams work hard to keep the other contained. TCU is the stronger team overall and I see them pulling away in the end for the much closer then it looks 14 point win.
 
TCU 35
Boise State 21